hi,
i think that "instances of" screen, must displayes "retained size" on each line, and elements must be ordered by "retained size" (although they are grouped in 500 elements)
thanks.
"instances of" must displayes "retained size&
-
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:52 pm
Unfortunately, calculation of retained size is _very_ CPU consuming task. I'm affraid that whole view will be unusable if retained sizes are shown.
We are currently investigating how to speedup calculation; perhaps some estimated sizes can be shown. What you this about it?
Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
We are currently investigating how to speedup calculation; perhaps some estimated sizes can be shown. What you this about it?
Regards,
Vladimir Kondratyev
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:26 pm
-
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:52 pm
We are currently working on combination of these three approaches.
The only problem is that if table is sorted by retained size column and retained sizes are only estimated values (for example, it's known that retained size of object < XXXX bytes) then pressing button "define more precisely retaines sizes" can cause resorting of the table. The result is unpredictable and user can be confused.
--vladimir
The only problem is that if table is sorted by retained size column and retained sizes are only estimated values (for example, it's known that retained size of object < XXXX bytes) then pressing button "define more precisely retaines sizes" can cause resorting of the table. The result is unpredictable and user can be confused.
--vladimir