Thank a lot for providing feedback. Really appreciated. Please find my comments below.
It was not obvious that all the build details are hidden behind the bluish "Build 1" label, after opening a repository. I had read the announcement and half of the help pages, and just couldn't map that overview screen with all the detailed screenshots. Maybe you want to have an explicit button besides that label.
But “Build 1” looks like a hyperlink. It’s blue and has hover effect. We thought that it should be recognizable as a clickable active control. There is also popup menu in “Trends” graphs which has “Open Build” action.
Next/Previous doesn't scale. If you have 20+ builds, you are lost in navigation.
Please describe your workflow. We expect that the user clicks on some build in “Trends” graph and then opens it clicking “Build #N” link. That is why “Trends” are at the left side of the screen. For example, I would like to inspect internals of some long build. I see the build in “Trends”, click it and then open. In my workflow I do not need “Next” and “Previous”, may be “Open build #N” when I know build number. Which task do you solve ?
Status Failed/Success is not really clear. In most cases this fits to the overall build result, but I also have a maven build with a compile error, which is "Success" in YouMonitor.
Does your entire build finish successfully or fail? If your build consists only from Maven and Maven fails, but YouMonitor reports it as a successful, then it is definitely a bug. But if Maven is only a part of the complex build and the build ignores Maven failure, then this is different situation.
Please add F5 keyboard shortcut to refresh the repo.
Will do. May be in the next bug-fix build.
On the build summary page underneath the durations headline are the durations by tool/technology. It would be nice to make those hyperlinks, which switch to the respective tabs. On all other screens the similar labels are already hyperlinks.
Thank you for suggestion.
There is much empty space on build summary and "tool X" tabs. E.g. the summary contains 2 graphs with maybe 100 pixels of height, which could consume all the whitespace underneath to show more details with higher resolution. Similarly the Ant/Maven tabs could show more than 5 goals/targets to use the whitespace.
The interesting moment is that some people reported that they do not want to see more than 5 lines in top charts. Initially we showed as many lines as free space allows and people complained about UI cluttering. It seems that it should be configurable.
BTW, what is the resolution of your monitor?