Roadmap?
-
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:37 am
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 am
One thing that we already have discussed in another topic is "wall time". The "real" time spent in a function, not consumed CPU time. Helps with detecting bad t-sql queries and thread sleep implementation.
Havnt investigated if its possible in current version, but, ability to name the snapshots instead of just getting the datetime.now filename and have to renaming it afterwards.
API integration, the ability to programmatically take a snapshot.
Bugs:
A better VS200X integration, currently this wont work at all.
Possibly bugs:
When calculating retained size for a object, this may take forever.
Ideas:
Posibility to see the t-sql stament if a System.Data.Common.DbConnection object has been invoked. To detect bad queries. (Good thing if wall time is measured)
More to come surely...
Havnt investigated if its possible in current version, but, ability to name the snapshots instead of just getting the datetime.now filename and have to renaming it afterwards.
API integration, the ability to programmatically take a snapshot.
Bugs:
A better VS200X integration, currently this wont work at all.
Possibly bugs:
When calculating retained size for a object, this may take forever.
Ideas:
Posibility to see the t-sql stament if a System.Data.Common.DbConnection object has been invoked. To detect bad queries. (Good thing if wall time is measured)
More to come surely...
-
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:37 am
Hello,
Thanks for the suggestions.
Retained size calculation is a time-consuming operation, and the time it takes depends on the size of snapshot.
Best regards,
Anton
Thanks for the suggestions.
It will for sure be possible to measure wall time instead of CPU time for certain methods (customizable).One thing that we already have discussed in another topic is "wall time". The "real" time spent in a function, not consumed CPU time. Helps with detecting bad t-sql queries and thread sleep implementation.
With current version, you can afterwards rename snapshot file in open snapshot dialog (Ctrl+O).Havnt investigated if its possible in current version, but, ability to name the snapshots instead of just getting the datetime.now filename and have to renaming it afterwards.
Will be added for sure.API integration, the ability to programmatically take a snapshot.
Do you mean problems navigating to folded code? We will find a solution for this.Bugs:
A better VS200X integration, currently this wont work at all.
Which view do you mean? Could you please provide more detail.Possibly bugs:
When calculating retained size for a object, this may take forever.
Retained size calculation is a time-consuming operation, and the time it takes depends on the size of snapshot.
Thanks, we'll consider this.Ideas:
Posibility to see the t-sql stament if a System.Data.Common.DbConnection object has been invoked. To detect bad queries. (Good thing if wall time is measured)
Would you anyway need this feature should existing VS navigation drawbacks be solved?Possibilty to see the code for selected object without having VS200X installed. One of your competitors have this feature.
Best regards,
Anton
-
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:37 am
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 am
Another idea.
- Posibility to create custom telemetry graph based on windows performance counters. It would be nice if it is somehow was shown togheter with existing telemetry graphs and "linked"/saved with snapshots. .Net has a nice working API for implementing this (System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter to get started).
- Posibility to create custom telemetry graph based on windows performance counters. It would be nice if it is somehow was shown togheter with existing telemetry graphs and "linked"/saved with snapshots. .Net has a nice working API for implementing this (System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter to get started).
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 am
Tobbe wrote:Another idea.
- Posibility to create custom telemetry graph based on windows performance counters. It would be nice if it is somehow was shown togheter with existing telemetry graphs and "linked"/saved with snapshots. .Net has a nice working API for implementing this (System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter to get started).
Sry a better class to view is System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounterCategory it has static mehods to get machine counters.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 am
Re:
Im curious about the Early Access Program for version 3.5 in nearest future. It's almost been a year...Anton Katilin wrote: (by Anton Katilin » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:47 pm )
Hello,
We will open Early Access Program for version 3.5 in nearest future.
What features would you mostly like to see in next version? Feature set is still under consideration, so you have great chance to influence it.
Best regards,
Anton
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:14 pm
Re: Roadmap?
Will intermediate beta versions be available?
I am urgently seeking for a solution regarding the issue - when > 10 .NET Applications need to be instrumented and triggered at the same time - this is not possible with yourkit
-------------
When will the next version be available?
I am urgently seeking for a solution regarding the issue - when > 10 .NET Applications need to be instrumented and triggered at the same time - this is not possible with yourkit
-------------
When will the next version be available?
-
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:52 pm
Re: Roadmap?
edgar, beta of the next version will be available this spring. Since fix of current limitation in 10 visible applications is very important for you, we'll backport the fix in version 3.0.8 which will be released next week. Stay tuned!
-
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:52 pm
Re: Roadmap?
edgar,
version 3.0.8 is available for download http://www.yourkit.com/dotnet/download/
Please confirm that it fixes issue with connection to more than 10 applications.
version 3.0.8 is available for download http://www.yourkit.com/dotnet/download/
Please confirm that it fixes issue with connection to more than 10 applications.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 am
Re: Roadmap?
edgar wrote:Will intermediate beta versions be available?
I am urgently seeking for a solution regarding the issue - when > 10 .NET Applications need to be instrumented and triggered at the same time - this is not possible with yourkit
-------------
When will the next version be available?
Will there be a intermediate beta versions for wall time measuring?
-
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:52 pm
Re: Roadmap?
We'll open access to beta version in April.